Welcome to Geometry in Everyday Objects! Welcome! Browse discussions about household shape kits, flat-to-solid activities, and the edges-and-faces questions that come up when studying everyday objects. Feel free to read along and join a thread whenever a shape question catches your eye.

Improving Evaluation Metrics for Vision-and-Language Models

  • Thread starter Thread starter admin
  • Start date Start date
A

admin

Guest
Evaluating image captions is essential for ensuring both linguistic fluency and accurate semantic alignment with visual content. While reference-free metrics such as CLIPScore have advanced automated caption evaluation, most existing work on learned evaluation metrics remains limited to pointwise English-centric assessments, with significant gaps in terms of reliability, interpretability, and multilingual inclusivity of vision-and-language evaluation metrics.

In this seminar session I will explore extensions of current English-centric benchmarks to a multilingual scenario promoting the development of more inclusive frameworks.

Additionally I will present two extensions from CLIPScore metric aiming to improve its interpretability and reliability in real world applications. Leveraging a model-agnostic conformal risk control framework, I will explore the calibration of CLIPScore distributions values for task-specific control variables tackling both granular assessment for individual word errors within captions, and the calibration of these raw distribution scores producing a more reliable interval for captioning evaluation by improving the correlation between uncertainty estimations and prediction errors.


The post Improving Evaluation Metrics for Vision-and-Language Models appeared first on Priberam.
 
Last edited:
Top